Galactus seems like someone you can bargain or.

This article will pit Kang against Galactus, analyzing their attributes to determine who’d be the likely victor if they ever met in battle.

Galactus is the Devourer of Worlds and is a cosmic entity like no other in the Marvel Universe. .

He is set.

Marvel had the license to print Star Trek comics in the '90s.

. After a run-in with Marvel's heroes in ancient Egypt, Kang attempts to return to his own time, but accidentally goes too far into the future and discovers a world ravaged by war and ripe for the conquering. .

.

. But the bigger the difference in Class is, the more obvious it is who'll win in a fight. Doctor Strange.

comicbasics. May 16, 2023 · But given the history of the Fantastic Four, the safest bets are Doctor Doom or Galactus.

Galactus is an omnipotent or nigh-omnipotent being to some, he has virtually limitless power from the Power Cosmic but what if he went toe to toe with.

193.

. well if he's got his army from when he was fighting ultron in the latest avenegrs storyline he'd do better seeing how it.

Even without the Infinity Stones, the Mad Titan has super strength, a superior intellect, and a solid multi-cleft chin. That being said, only one member of the Fantastic Four could defeat Galactus alone and it’s thanks to his unbelievably high intellect.

Galactus laughs at this guy!! 12 years ago.
.
Mar 1, 2023 · On Earth-18854, Kang took the power of Galactus himself and became “Kang the Time Eater.

comicbasics.

The FF also have a history with one of Kang’s variants, Rama-Tut, so that’s another possibility.

Jul 25, 2017 · Few other heroes square up against the “World-Eater” as much as Reed Richards and the Fantastic Four do. com/kang-vs-galactus-who-would-win-why/#SnippetTab" h="ID=SERP,5733. Thanos: Who Wins in the MCU? By Valentina Kraljik Published on January 11, 2023.

Nathanial Higgins · 1/22/2022. . . PirateKing69. .

How is this calculated ( INT^1.

Both villains are formidable. .

.

Superhero Battle match: Kang versus Galactus (Lifebringer).

.

.

.